Racism, Literacy & Lakota Perspective


Burkins writes about her growing up years as a middle-class White person and later in life marries a Black man.  Of conflicting race and ethnicity, she and husband have biracial children. Burkins defines this arrangement as an overlapping space between two races, which affords some interesting and difficult insights.  She proclaims “Overt forms of racism were not demonstrated or endorsed by my family, but from the larger environment in which I existed” (Burkins, 2007, p. 164).  She writes about the following myths of White or middle-class people often make about people of differing race and or ethnicity.  Accordingly the myths indicate that poverty is related to poor choices, laziness, or even sin.  Affection is in the form of material success and the ability to buy a person’s affection. Therefore, people of low economic status display little love for their children.  More profoundly, there exist a superior race, “White”, and that racism doesn’t really exist anymore.  Burkins (2007) professes, “However, I have come to understand that admitting prejudice and acknowledging racism does not make me an evil person; it makes me an honest person” (p. 174).

            Burkins composes, most literacy coaches as being White and for the most part, white literacy coaches are teaching white teachers how to teach students of color.  She questions how this interrelates to the achievement gap by not sharing the same ethnic background. Anderson, a southern, African- American woman, who happens to be a Literacy Coach Specialist discusses the internal tensions she faces.  Based on her experience and those shared by other African-America coaches, there seems to exist on-going struggle with the term “two-ness”; A constant juggling act; working in the education world—its practices  and customs steeped in mostly White middle-class values—while holding onto our African-American roots.  One community asks us to adopt its norms and values, and the other says, “Don’t forget where you come from” (Anderson, 2008, p. 1).  Anderson devices another term “Crash Episodes”, were her inner self-collide with the messages of others’ inner selves.  “In my position as a Literacy Coach Specialist, there are times in which I am enraged by the subtle and sometimes overt statements or actions by colleagues that call into question my competence as a literacy leader” (Anderson, 2008, p. 1).  Being a Lakota, (American Indian) educator, I relate to Anderson’s “two-ness” and “Crash Episodes” were one of the initial instincts is to weigh these interactions determining if they are racist and if they are derived from the innuendos Toll points out as prevalent myths of the White society.  As one steps back from the overlapping space of race or differing insights, Burkins and Anderson, as well as Toll, points out that coaching is building trusting relationships. 

            In the building of trusting relationships, Anderson writes, “this means not only being honest but being real. It means being willing to have difficult, but necessary conversations” (2008, p. 2). In association Burkins inscribes about raising consciousness about racism and how to point the way toward constructive action and begin to address institutional or systemic racism within and beyond the school (Burkins, 2007, p. 175-177). She provides actions involving seeking the support of others who are or have been working through their own racial identity and or to develop relationships with people who are different from you. To conclude she prescribes to reading and study to assist in speaking up against the system of oppression and to challenge them.

            As the authors of this course point out, being honest and real in the raising consciousness about literacy and how to coach toward constructive action through the building of trusting relationships is vital to my learning in this course.  Paramount, as noted by Burkins, “My advice is to remember this: No matter how much you may disagree with other educators about teaching practices, class management, assessment, or anything else, what you have in common with them is that you all care about students” (Burkins, 2005, p.135).  Zeilinger (1986) in the Book, Lakota Life, writes about the Lakota Virtues of respect (p. 23-25). He makes note that in order for people to live together in peace, they have to respect one another (p. 23-25).  Toll (2005) when teachers are resistant, it doesn't automatically mean that they don't want to change or are lazy. By examining why a person resists, one can learn more about that person. In this case, resistance might be a source of information and growth (p. 120). The evolution of respect is bound up in listening and learning.  By listening to teachers, we may find there is shared a commonality, although they have chosen a different means to come to the same conclusion.  When there is a common outcome, there is more room for discussion.  Important to listening and communicating teachers need to feel they are being heard, and their reasons are honored (Toll, 2005, p. 113).


Reference

Anderson, C. (2008). One Conversation: Exploring the Role of Culture in Coaching. Literacy       Coaching Clearinghouse. Retrieved November 29, 2015.

Burkins, J. (2007). Coaching for balance: How to meet the challenges of literacy coaching.            Newark, Del.:    International Reading Association.

Toll, C. (2005). How Do I Coach Individuals. In The literacy coach's survival guide: Essential

            questions and practical answers. Newark, DE: International Reading Association.

No comments:

Post a Comment