Reading Coach Forms & Documents

Abstract

There are many documents for the literacy coach to use for planning, scheduling, organizing, and for providing teacher and program feedback. An introductory form that brings about communication with the classroom teacher dealing with the nature of teaching and literacy coaching is a great starting point.  Connected to this form is a classroom teacher survey which brings about further communication.  It is this survey which allows the classroom teacher to discuss strengths and areas of focus for further literacy coaching.  This communicative form is used throughout the coaching processes as the teachers become more involved literacy instruction.  To document the classroom conferences provides the literacy coach with program reflection, and serves as a program reporting piece. 

Reading Coach Forms and Documents

Literacy coaches assist with multiple teachers on many different topics and use many different methods of coaching. Many of the forms and documents used can serve as aids to assist the classroom teacher and the literacy coach on the nature of teaching and literacy.  These forms become the documenting program piece for the literacy program.  Newman (2009) uses a introductory document for the literacy program, a connective document by Toll (2005) is the conference piece, while Rainville (n.d.) includes the program document piece.  In all, these documents provide for program reflection.  

Teacher Survey Request Form


The Teacher Survey/Request Form & Teacher Survey and the Reading InstructionTeacher Contact Form by Newman (2009) is a great school year starting point for the literacy coach to use.  These documents provide coaches feedback about the literacy instructional needs of the classroom teacher.  They also open the door for the literacy coach to provide support for the classroom teacher within a literacy specified area throughout the year.  Some of the literacy areas addressed by the documents and then identified by the teacher for support include interpreting data, setting up reading groups, developing lessons, to enhancing reading fluency. The survey also provides the literacy coach an understanding of the teachers’ literacy instruction strength and weakness. Although serving as that initial contact, perhaps at the beginning of the academic year, according to Newman, these documents can direct communications leading to effective coaching through out the school year.  as an accountability measures for the coach by identifying and tracking teachers’ needs over time.

 
Teacher Contact Form

Scheduling Individual Conferences seems to be a good starting point for the literacy coach after his or her review the Teacher Survey Request Form and the Instruction Teacher Contact Form introduced by Newman.  At the initial conference further discussion of the survey can be discussed with the classroom teacher.  An overview of the Individual Conference Record Sheet is introduced to the classroom teacher, followed by scheduling a classroom observation. Toll (2005) introduces the Individual Conference Record Sheet for the initial teacher conference, enable both the literacy coach and the teacher to focus on needs, strengths, and concerns (p. 79). Toll’s Conference Record Sheet seems to transition smoothly from Newman’s Survey by preparing a focus for discussion during the conference.  Toll suggest that the Conference Record Sheet be used thereafter for proceeding conferences. For example; A second distribution can occur at the conclusion of the first marking period or second/third month of school. Important points addressed and recorded in the Conference Record Sheet includes: How it’s Going, Items Discussed, For Future Discussion, Goals, Action Steps (Teacher & Coach), Next Meeting, Bring to Next Meeting.  Of most important a schedule of the follow-up conferenc (Toll, 2005).

Teacher Contact Form

Literacy coaches interact with multiple teachers on many supportive topics and during their interaction they may use many different methods of coaching. The teacher contact form introduced by Rainville(n.d.) is an important way a coach can monitor and assess his or her coaching.  The Teacher Contact Form prescribed by Rainville, provides the coach with teacher contact records, and also allows a coach to review periodically coaching methods that he or she has employed with all teachers.  This form provides for a reflective piece for the literacy coach. Not only does it serve as a monitoring piece, provides coaching reflection, it also serves as a program planning and reporting piece.  Burkins (2007) says to manage and analyze data, organize data for presentation to faculty, and develop action plans on data (p. 32). 

The recorded coaching methods of Raniville’s Teacher Contact Form are as follows and are indicated on the contact form:  CE=Classroom Environment; CL=Collaborative Lesson; D=Demonstration Lesson; ED=Educational Discussion; GR=Gathering Resources; PR=Pre-conference; CO=Coaching.   Observation; PO=Post-conference; SC=School Closed; SG=Study Group; WS=Workshop. This tool allows a coach to keep track of the monthly coaching methods that he or she uses with all teachers and to subsequently reflect and repor (Rainville, n.d., p. 3). 

Bean & Frost (2006), recommend that schools seek out individuals who are successful teachers at the grade levels in which they are expected to coach. They must have thorough knowledge of literacy, the acquisition, assessment, and instruction. An important part of their recommendation is the coach’s ability to provide teacher feedback. Teachers are more likely to gain the literacy coaches assistance if they possess these traits. Bean & DeFord (2006), says an important duty of the literacy coach is to let the data lead and document your work. The documents prescribed by Newman, Toll, and Rainville are useful for the initial contact with classroom teachers and thereafter periodicially.  They also serve as a ocumentary pieces which cause coaching reflection prescribed in sound programing.


References


Burkins, J. (2007). Coaching for balance: How to meet the challenges of literacy coaching. Newark, Del.: International Reading Association.

DeFord, B. (n.d.). Do's and Dont's for Literacy Coaches: Advice from the Field. Literacy Coaching Clearing House, 1-5.

Newman, T. (2009, April 20). Teacher Survey/Request Form & Teacher Survey: Reading

            Instruction. Retrieved September 20, 2015, http://www.literacycoachingonline.org/briefs/

 tools/Newman_Tools_Teacher_Survey_4.20.09.pdf

Rainville, K. (n.d.). Teacher Contact Form. Retrieved September 20, 2015, from


 
Toll, C. (2005). How Do I Coach Individuals. In The literacy coach's survival guide: Essential
 
              questions and practical answers. Newark, DE: International Reading Association.

 

 


No comments:

Post a Comment